PAIN: it's all in the mind?

Return to Tutorial FIVE notes

Pain is an important clinical symptom. which usually signifies that something is wrong, e.g. tissue damage or disease. Pain is also one of the classical components of inflammation. Often, the pattern and presentation of the pain can be sufficiently characteristic to provide a diagnosis, but sometimes the origin of the pain can be misleading - as in referred pain.
factors influencing pain
 
 

At its simplest level, pain appears to be like other sensations, and is mediated by its own neural pathway of specific receptors, afferent nerves, CNS relays and ascending projections, etc. But in reality, pain is very complex and can be affected by numerous factors, as shown in this graphic.
 
 
 
 
 

Nociceptors and afferent nerves

High threshold receptors, probably free nerve endings.

There are several distinct types of nociceptors:

Nociceptor Sensitization:

Increased pain sensitivity following tissue damage - hyperalgesia - involving increased nociceptor responsiveness, lowered threshold to stimulation. Due to release of inflammatory agents, e.g. kinins & prostaglandins, hence the analgesic effects of aspirin, paracetamol.


CNS pathways

Nociceptive afferents synapse with two main groups of neurons in the dorsal horn: There are several projection pathways from the spinal cord to the brain:

(a) A 'specific' pathway, probably the spinothalamic tracts, which projects to the somatosensory cortex. This pathway probably serves the 'sensory' and 'discriminative' aspects of pain.

(b) A 'non-specific' pathway, probably involving the spinoreticulothalamic tracts, which makes widespread and diffuse connections with many areas of the forebrain, including the limbic system. This system may serve the affective (or 'nasty') aspects of pain.

Problems with the notion of a specific neural pathway for pain:

Although pain generally arises from an obvious physical cause, e.g. tissue damage or disease, the relation between the 'stimulus' and the 'response' is not a simple one:


Gate control theory

This was proposed in an attempt to overcome the limitations of a specific and direct neural pathway serving pain and nociception.

The basic concept is that signals elicited in afferent neurons by noxious stimuli can be blocked or filtered by a synaptic 'gate' in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. The story is complex and there are many controversial features. However, the principle does seem to work in practice. even if the precise mechanisms are unsettled.

The 'gate' is believed to be located in the substantia gelatinosa (SG) of the dorsal horn.
Neurons of the SG make connections with the terminals of primary afferent fibres and also the dendrites of dorsal horn cells. Through either pre-synaptic or postsynaptic inhibition, the substantia gelatinosa neurons appear to be able to block (or reduce) activation of second order neurons by nociceptive inputs; these 'gating' effects of the SG neurons can be activated by:

(a) inputs in large diameter (A) afferents innervating the injured area. (This provides the basis for pain relief by selective activation of large diameter afferents, as in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation - TENS).

(b) activation of neurons in certain brainstem regions, which send axons to the spinal cord.The Gate Theory of analgesia

Endogenous analgesic systems

Electrical stimulation of brainstem sites, such as the periaqueductal grey matter (PAGM) and raphe nuclei can produce analgesia, and has also been shown to inhibit dorsal horn neurons that are activated by nociceptor inputs. There is evidence for at least two descending systems from the brainstem that can influence synaptic transmission in the dorsal horn.

The central effects of opium and narcotic analgesic drugs like morphine have been known for a very long time, but it is only recently that techniques have become available to investigate their mechanisms of action. The CNS is known to contain several different types of opiate receptors. These are acted upon by a number of naturally occurring opioid peptide transmitters, such as enkephalins and endorphins.

The precise mode of action of these opioids in analgesia is uncertain, but they are present in areas such as the PAGM and dorsal horn (substantia gelatinosa) and are likely to be implicated in the neural basis of gate control.
diagram of physiology of stress
 

In overall adaptive terms, it seems that the endogenous analgesia system can be activated as part of a generalized neuro-endocrine response to stress.
Here, the stress is physical; indeed, many forms of physical activity e.g. exercise, and pleasurable activities such as eating, drinking and sexual behaviour, are known to cause the release of opioid peptides.

One aspect of this stress response is the familiar 'fight or flight' reaction involving increased sympathetic discharge and release of adrenal hormones (both medullary catecholamines and the glucocorticoids). In an animal thus prepared for 'fight or flight', there is perhaps added survival value in simultaneously being able to 'switch off' pain.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Whilst acute pain has undoubted survival value, the misery of chronic pain such as may be associated with arthritis or terminal cancer, is less easy to comprehend.

Return to Tutorial FIVE notes

Back to BBB Home page